After the end of the match, the commenter Harsha Bogle asked to ex-cricketers and cricket specialists Ravi Shastri and Sunil Gavaskar. Why India did not do well despite of so opportunities? The cricket specialists Ravi Shastri and Sunil Gavaskar explained in different way. From their discussion its come that England did a lot of runs from the bowling supported pitch for their unfastened fielding and using more spinners too. On the other hands, Sunil Gavaskar directly blamed to Sourav Ganguly for his slow movement on the no-strike end, he also added that 4 and 6 is important but single runs is the life of cricket. I am also adding that when Ranatunga was the captain of Sri-Lanka that time he showed that how important the single runs are. That time Sri-Lanka was best team and won world cup-99 by using that theory how to use the first 15 overs and how important the single runs are. Ravi also added that if he becomes fast more than ten or twelve runs would add. It was all the negative discussion about Indian team but they also discussed about the positive side of Indian team that was Sourav Ganguly’s coming back to the runs.
But Indian captain Rahul Dravid did not agree with them. After the end of the match commenter Harsha Bogle asked about their failure. Dravid replied that the bowers did well but the top orders batsmen’s early down and lower order’s batsmen’s quick down was the failure of Indian team. But Dravid is happy to Sourav’s coming back to the form that will help India on 4th ODI at Manchester .
Anyway, I think the cricket specialist Ravi Shastri and Sunil Gavaskar discussed form their view. Although I am neither a cricketer nor a specialist but as fan of cricket my opinion is that the accurate theme of the 3rd match India vs England was the tighten bowling and the responsible fielding which help England to win the match.